Tag: samsung

Posted on

Apple iPhone 5S vs Apple iPhone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4

Now that Apple has announced the iPhone 5S, it’s time for a side-by-side for comparison against the previous iPhone 5 and the de facto Android flagship, the Samsung Galaxy S4.

The first question is, is it an upgrade over the iPhone 5? The answer is yes, specifically in the processor, the camera, and Touch ID. Apple’s “S” releases are normally minor updates. So this is actually significant. Apple obviously is feeling the competitive pressure.

The next question is how does it fare against the Galaxy S4? By the numbers you would see that Galaxy S4 would win. But most numbers don’t matter much (e.g. processor speed, and megapixel count) without context. So I won’t even go into the 64-bit (although really that is significant). Numbers are nothing compared to the experience.

I’d say you can’t go wrong with either iPhone 5S or Samsung Galaxy S4. Personally, I’d go for the iPhone 5S due to four reasons: design (understated elegance), the size (I like my phones small and light), the camera (True Tone flash, 2.2/f aperture and 15% larger sensor) and Touch ID (definitely more secure than Android’s rather gimmicky face unlock).

Apple iPhone 5S Apple iPhone 5 Samsung Galaxy S4
Size 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6mm 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6mm 136.6 x 69.8 x 7.9 mm
Weight 112 g 112 g 130 g
Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
LTE LTE LTE
Display LED-backlit IPS TFT, capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors LED-backlit IPS TFT, capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors Super AMOLED HD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
640 x 1136 pixels, 4 inches (326 ppi) 640 x 1136 pixels, 4 inches (326 ppi) 1080 x 1920 pixels, 5.0 inches (441 ppi)
Processor unspecified processor, unspecified GPU, Apple A7 chipset, 64-bit unspecified processor, unspecified GPU, Apple A6 chipset Quad-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A15 & quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7, PowerVR SGX 544MP3 GPU
RAM unspecified unspecified 1/2 GB RAM
Internal Storage 16/32/64 GB 16/32/64 GB 16/32/64 GB
External Storage No External Memory No External Memory Up to 64GB
Data Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n dual-band
Bluetooth v4.0 with A2DP v4.0 with A2DP v4.0 with A2DP
NFC none none yes
Operating System iOS 7 iOS 6 Android v4.2 Jelly Bean
Camera 8 megapixel AF with True Tone dual-LED flash and f/2.2 aperture lens, 15-percent larger sensor, 10fps burst 8 megapixel AF, f/2.4 aperture lens 13 megapixel AF, f/2.2 aperture lens
Video 1080p at 30fps, LED video light 1080p at 30fps, LED video light 1080p at 30fps, LED video light
Apps About 900K from the Apple App Store About 900K from the Apple App Store About 1M from Google Play + access to non-market apps
Battery Standard battery, Li-Po Standard battery, Li-Po Standard battery, Li-Ion 2600 mAh
Standby Up to 270 h (3G) Up to 225 h (3G) Up to 370 h (3G)
Talk-time Up to 10 h (3G) Up to 8 h (3G) Up to 117 h (3G)
Posted on

Apple iPhone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S3

Now that Apple has announced the iPhone 5, it’s time for a side-by-side for comparison against the de facto Android flagship, the Samsung Galaxy S3. By the numbers alone, you can see that Galaxy S3 has set the bar and that the iPhone 5  is hard-pressed to match it. And the Galaxy S3 has been out for months now.

The significant advantages of the iPhone is size, weight, iOS 6, and the App Store. Size and weight is a matter of personal preference. While I like small phones, a lot of people love their phones with big-ass screens. As for iOS 6 and the App Store, both are under threat by the much-improved Android 4.1 Jelly Bean and fast-growing Android Play.

Continue reading “Apple iPhone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S3”

Posted on

Google Nexus 7

Google has announced their much-anticipated own brand tablet. At $199 it competes squarely against the older Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 and Amazon Kindle Fire. More importantly it moves closer towards the high-value price points set by the iPad. Way to go, Google!

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Amazon Kindle Fire Google Nexus 7
Size 193.7 x 122.4 x 10.5 mm 190 x 120 x 11.4 mm 198.5 x 120 x 10.5 mm
Weight 344 g 413 g 340 g
Display PLS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors IPS TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors LED-backlit IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
1024 x 600 pixels. 7 inches 1024 x 600 pixels, 7.0 inches 1280 x 800 pixels, 7.0 inches
Processor Dual-core 1 GHz CPU, PowerVR SGX540 GPU, TI OMAP 4430 chipset Dual-core 1 GHz Cortex-A9 CPU, PowerVR SGX540 GPU, TI OMAP 4430 chipset Quad-core 1.3 GHz processor, 12-core ULP GeForce GPU, Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset
RAM 1 GB RAM 512 MB RAM 1 GB RAM
Internal Storage 8/16/32 GB storage 8 GB storage 8/16 GB storage
External Storage Up to 64GB No External Memory No External Memory
Data Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Operating System Android OS, v4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) Amazon-customized Android OS, v2.3 (Gingerbread) Android OS, v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
Primary Camera 3.15 MP none 1.2 MP
Secondary Camera VGA none none
Video 1080p at 30fps none 720p at 30fps
Apps Android Market + access to non-market apps Amazon AppStore Android Market + access to non-market apps
Battery Standard battery, Li-Ion 4000 mAh Standard battery, Li-Ion 4400 mAh Standard battery, Li-Ion 4325 mAh
Battery Life 8h 8h 8h
Posted on

Galaxy Nexus and Ice Cream Sandwich

Watched the YouTube live stream of the launching of the Samsung/Google Galaxy Nexus and Android 4.0 aka Ice Cream Sandwich. The Galaxy Nexus has nice specs (1280×720 display!) though I’m not too hot on the form factor. I’ve never liked banana-shaped phones (Nokia 7110/8110 anyone?) nor humongous screens (which unfortunately is the trend). But Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) stole the limelight. Slick new UI, powerful new features (Face Unlock, Beam, folders, screenshots, etc.). Both the phone and ICS seem to have patent-issue avoidance in mind, e.g. the phone cannot be mistaken for any iDevice, the new folders don’t have the content-view of iOS.

Posted on

Galaxy S2 vs iPhone 4S

A lot of people are disappointed by the iPhone 4S. I’m not, so I tried to understand the disparity. The easiest thing to do is to look at the numbers. Numbers tell a lot, but not everything. As can be seen from the CPU clock speed wars and later the camera megapixel wars. So with that in mind, I laid out a side-by-side for comparison against the de facto Android flagship, the Samsung Galaxy S2.

What the numbers tell me is that the Galaxy S2 has set the bar and that the iPhone 4S merely matched it. But that’s by the numbers. People who are numbers fixated were disappointed because of this. But the previous generation Galaxy S more or less matched the iPhone 4 in specs. Yet, in sales it was pretty far behind. This can be attributed to marketing and the merits of the phone. How much of each, or even simply which one, depends on your particular bias. Other people were caught up in the hype and were disappointed. They practically set themselves up for it.

Continue reading “Galaxy S2 vs iPhone 4S”